LAWCOMM 403 long notes.docx-CONTENTS Tip...
LAWCOMM_403_long_notes.docx-CONTENTS Tips ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introducon ............................................................................................................................................................................
Showing 115 out of 157
LAWCOMM 403 long notes.docx-CONTENTS Tips ...........
LAWCOMM_403_long_notes.docx-CONTENTS Tips ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introducon ............................................................................................................................................................................
LAWCOMM 403 long notes.docx-CONTENT...
LAWCOMM_403_long_notes.docx-CONTENTS Tips ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introducon ............................................................................................................................................................................
Page 115
However, it does meet the 10% capital reducon test in secon CD 22(3)(b), but the Commissioner
must give noce to the company that the Commissioner does not intend to ulise the an-avoidance
rule in secon CD 22(6)
Previous versions of the ITA made it clear that the company should approach the
Commissioner and request a noce that the an-avoidance rule would not be applied. The
Commissioner can issue a binding ruling, although local offices can, through wrien noce,
confirm that they will not apply subsecon 6.
In the event that the Commissioner did so confirm and that the 10% capital reducon test
was met, the payment must be less than or equal to the available subscribed capital per
share to be excluded from the dividend definion. In this case the numerator is $100,000 and
the denominator is 14,400 = $6.94 per share. Accordingly, the payment of $2.50 per share
would be an excluded dividend.
A
NTI
-
AVOIDANCE
RULE
THE
DIVIDEND
IN
LIEU
TEST
A return of capital will be a dividend if any part of the payment is in lieu of a dividend.
CD 22
Returns of capital: off-market share cancellaons
(6)
Neither subsecon (2) nor (4) excludes an amount paid by a company on cancellaon of a share from being a dividend
if
any part of the payment is in lieu of the payment of a dividend
.
(7)
For the purposes of applying subsecon (6), the following factors must be considered:
(a)
the nature and amount of dividends paid by the company before or aſter the cancellaon; and
(b)
the issue of shares in the company aſter the cancellaon; and
(c)
the expressed purpose or purposes of the cancellaon; and
(d)
any other relevant factor.
The main three factors to look at to determine whether the cancellaon is in lieu of a dividend:
o
The nature and amount of any actual dividends paid before or aſter cancellaon
If the company has paid out dividends regularly in the past, then this parcular transacon probably
will not be a dividend in lieu
If the company hasn’t paid any dividends aſter cancellaon:
This may suggest that this parcular transacon is a dividend in lieu – the company has paid
15% of its capital and now does not have money to pay a dividend, so by cancelling shares it
was trying to pay dividends in advance
However, there may also be other reasons – perhaps the company wasn’t as profitable
aſterwards
o
Issue of shares aſter cancellaon
The whole point of the cancellaon is to reduce capital, but issuing new shares would raise capital
again – therefore, this suggests that the cancellaon was a dividend in lieu
o
Purpose of the cancellaon
Are there genuine commercial reasons? – for example:
To gain strategic control of shares in certain hands – even if you did a pro rata offer, some
shareholders may have strategically decided not to accept
The company wants to alter its debt-equity rao because of surplus capital
Reducing cash and obtaining cheaper loans (as interest rates are historically low right now)
to add more debt to the balance sheet
Example
o
Same facts as above
o
Assume bright line test has been met
o
The company must also sasfy the Commissioner that the payment is not a payment in lieu of a dividend
o
The interpretaon statement issued by the Commissioner and contained in Tax Informaon Bullen, Volume
11, number 8 (September 1999) provides helpful guidance on how the Commissioner will apply the various
elements of the test contained in subsecon 7
History of dividends paid


Ace your assessments! Get Better Grades
Browse thousands of Study Materials & Solutions from your Favorite Schools
Vanderbilt University
Vanderbilt_University
School:
Tax_Law
Course:
Great resource for chem class. Had all the past labs and assignments
Leland P.
Santa Clara University
Introducing Study Plan
Using AI Tools to Help you understand and remember your course concepts better and faster than any other resource.
Find the best videos to learn every concept in that course from Youtube and Tiktok without searching.
Save All Relavent Videos & Materials and access anytime and anywhere
Prepare Smart and Guarantee better grades

Students also viewed documents