LAWCOMM 403 long notes.docx-CONTENTS Tip...
LAWCOMM_403_long_notes.docx-CONTENTS Tips ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introducon ............................................................................................................................................................................
Showing 96 out of 157
LAWCOMM 403 long notes.docx-CONTENTS Tips ...........
LAWCOMM_403_long_notes.docx-CONTENTS Tips ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introducon ............................................................................................................................................................................
LAWCOMM 403 long notes.docx-CONTENT...
LAWCOMM_403_long_notes.docx-CONTENTS Tips ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introducon ............................................................................................................................................................................
Page 96
The best case scenario for a deducons issue is to get a full and immediate deducon for the
expenditure – this means it has to be of a revenue nature
But if it is of a capital nature, the next best case is to get a depreciaon deducon –
this means it has to produce a capital asset that is depreciable
But if there is no capital asset, there is nothing to depreciate – so the expenditure is
not deducble at all
Black hole expenditure is problemac because it incenvizes taxpayers to use expenditure to
produce a dud asset in order to get depreciaon deducons – this isn’t economically efficient
Aſter this decision, taxpayers were not happy with the ruling and the Income Tax Act was amended on
30 March 2021 in relaon to feasibility expenditure with secon DB 66
DB 66
Feasibility expenditure: spread deducon
(1)
This secon applies when a person has—
(a)
incurred expenditure for the income year in relaon to making progress towards compleng, creang, or acquiring
property that, if it were to be completed, created, or acquired, the property would be—
(i)
depreciable property for which the depreciaon rate is more than 0%:
(ii)
revenue account property; and
(b)
abandoned further progress in relaon to the property, with the result that it is not completed, created, or
acquired; and
(c)
no deducon in relaon to the property or expenditure under any other provision.
(2)
The person is allowed a deducon for the expenditure described in subsecon (1), in equal proporons over a period of 5
income years starng in the year in which they abandon further progress.
(3)
This secon overrides the capital limitaon. The general permission must sll be sasfied and the other general
limitaons sll apply.
This basically allows deducons for expenditure for which you are not entled to an immediate deducon, but also
does not produce a capital asset (as it was abandoned) and thus unavailable for a depreciaon deducon – at the point
in me the project is abandoned, in that income tax year, you are entled to a deducon that can be spread over 5
years
o
The policy of this is that the economic value of business expenditure that is expected to decline in value should
be either immediately deducble or, when it provides an enduring benefit, deducble over me if that benefit
declines over me
o
If the tax system does not provide that such treatment, an economic distoron is created
DB 67
Feasibility expenditure: immediate deducon
(1)
This secon applies when a person has—
(a)
incurred expenditure for the income year in relaon to making progress towards compleng, creang, or acquiring
property that, if it were to be completed, created, or acquired, the property would be—
(i)
depreciable property for which the depreciaon rate is more than 0%:
(ii)
revenue account property; and
(b)
no deducon for the property or expenditure under any other provision.
(2)
The person is allowed a deducon for the expenditure described in subsecon (1), if their total expenditure described in
subsecon (1) is $10,000 or less for the income year.
(3)
This secon overrides the capital limitaon. The general permission must sll be sasfied and the other general
limitaons sll apply.
If the expenditure is $10,000 or less, the taxpayer is entled to an immediate deducon
o
The policy of this is that any expenditure less than $10,000 is already being deducted anyway, and it is not
worth the burden of conducng a minute examinaon on small amounts
These provisions apply to expenditure incurred in the 2020–21 and later income years
PRIVATE AND DOMESTIC EXPENDITURE – THE PRIVATE LIMITATION
Expenditure of a private or domesc nature is not deducble
(
secon DA 2(2)
)
Case L11
(1989) 11 NZTC 1,085
o
Facts


Ace your assessments! Get Better Grades
Browse thousands of Study Materials & Solutions from your Favorite Schools
Vanderbilt University
Vanderbilt_University
School:
Tax_Law
Course:
Great resource for chem class. Had all the past labs and assignments
Leland P.
Santa Clara University
Introducing Study Plan
Using AI Tools to Help you understand and remember your course concepts better and faster than any other resource.
Find the best videos to learn every concept in that course from Youtube and Tiktok without searching.
Save All Relavent Videos & Materials and access anytime and anywhere
Prepare Smart and Guarantee better grades

Students also viewed documents